Summary of essay Shambles of Science, Lizzy Lind af Hageby & Leisa Schartau, History department, Stockholm university, 28th of February 1996, printed in 1997. Lisa Gålmark.

"The long trial revealed the most brilliant piece of advocacy that the Bar has known since the day of Russell, though it was entirely conducted by a woman. Women, it appears, may sway courts and judges, but they may not even elect to the High Court of Parliament." (The Nation 26/4-1913)

In a time when women were not allowed to vote, not allowed to become lawyers, and representatives of the medical establishment asserted that an educated woman risked getting her uterus destroyed (and so could not have children), a young Swedish woman triumphed as her own advocate in a British trial. Who was she who gave rise to such admiration, and who during a decade on to 1914 continually appeared as controversial in the British press? And what did she defend in the trial of 1913?

Lizzy Lind-af-Hageby's and Leisa Schartau's eventful life in England at the turn of the century is the subject of this paper in history. For the first time these forgotten British-Swedish events are paid thorough attention to. Archives; presscuttings, protocols, reports, diaries which have not been researched before have been used to unravel a story with Lind-af-Hageby's and Schartau's book "Shambles of Science" as a starting-point.

The book "Shambles of Science", which caused much debate and publicity when it was published in 1903, is built upon diary notes of the two women; notes that were taken during studies at King's and University's College in London. After having been granted special permission (otherwise for men only) to attend so called vivisections on animals performed before students, Lind-af-Hageby and Schartau - during 1901 joint secretaries of the Nordic Society against scientific animal abuse - were able to expose the situation for animals used in such vivisections. Through their book, Lind-af-Hageby and Schartau can be said to have performed an early sample of what nowadays is called muckraking or investigative journalism.

Lind-af-Hageby and Schartau were not representative of their time. They were upperclass-women, extremely talented and obviously persons of means. But they represented and were leaders of a strong movement at that time: the anti-vivisection movement. Its contours are seen in the story and the seldom focused fact that the movement harboured different ideologies is being emphasized in this paper. Lind-af-Hageby and Schartau stretched many limits, defied written and unwritten rules for women. They went out into the streets, talked from speech tribunes, arranged rallies in the open - and this in a time when women of their social class were expected to wait for their husband at home, placidly embroidering something probably not so useful. The two women engaged themselves in other radical movements, founded new organizations and edited a journal. Lind-af-Hageby debated in public with doctors and physiologists, attended courtrooms and wrote newspaper columns. They can be said to have participated in clearing the way for the "new women" of the time.

Lind-af-Hageby and Schartau were also intellectually sophisticated. They advocated a moral utopism which entailed the promoting of all sorts of reform in society: The death penalty, flogging, torture, slavery, prostitution, gender unjustices, social barriers, vaccination, vivisection and animal exploitation were on their abolition list. They advocated franchise reform for women, preventive healthcare, vegetarianism, healthcare - and social reform. Their anti-vivisection commitment was part of an outlook on ethics and society as a whole.

Many women supported the anti-vivisection movement at that time. Why? The paper employs literature about this specific time in history to place the story in a context. Theories about gender roles and values concerning men and women and the strongly male-dominated society are applied to make the two women's commitment and society's reactions to them comprehensible. In our animal- and natureinterested society the story about Lind-af-Hageby and Schartau seems surprisingly current. Modern lines of argumentation and commitment seem to have deep roots. For debaters of today there is much to learn and recognize.

Keywords: Lizzy Lind af Hageby, Leisa Schartau, investigative journalism, animal rights, feminism, new woman